Help us improve LowCarbonPower by taking this survey →
{{ this.years[FYWD] }}
En ce moment à l'écran: {{ this.years[this.y] }}
The percentage of electricity that is generated domestically from low-carbon sources.

16.8% de l'électricité totale est générée à partir de Énergie hydraulique

Qu'est ce que l'Énergie hydraulique ?

Hydroelectricity, or hydropower, is a renewable energy source that creates electricity from the flow of water. Captured by turbines, the power of water from rivers and waterfalls drives alternators that generate electricity.

Dams were already used in ancient Greece and China and expanded in the medieval period to grind grain. First invented in the 19th century, the first hydroelectric turbine was installed in 1895 at Niagara Falls and still operates today. This power source has grown rapidly since the beginning of the 20th century, producing 4355 TWh in 2020, four times more than in 1970.

As the first source of low-carbon energy before nuclear energy (10.1%) and the first source of renewable energy ahead of wind (6.2%) and solar (3.3%), hydropower produces 16.8% of the world's electricity. China has tripled its hydropower production from 436 TWh in 2006 to 1288 TWh in 2020. Furthermore, 54.6% of Brazil's electricity and 61.2% of Canada's electricity comes from hydropower.

In addition to its classic role of electricity production, hydropower dams can be used to store energy by pumping water upwards. Storage can potentially help compensate for intermittent energy sources such as wind and solar power.


L'Énergie hydraulique est elle une source d'énergie bas carbone ?

Oui, grâce à ses faibles émissions sur tout son cycle de vie, l'énergie Énergie hydraulique est considérée comme une source d'énergie bas carbone.

La médiane des émisions en cycle de vie de l'Énergie hydraulique est de 24 gCO2eq/kWh. Where do our emissions numbers come from?

Éolien11 gCO2eq / kWhBas carbone
Nucléaire12 gCO2eq / kWhBas carbone
Énergie hydraulique24 gCO2eq / kWhBas carbone
Géothermique38 gCO2eq / kWhBas carbone
Solaire45 gCO2eq / kWhBas carbone
Bio-carburants230 gCO2eq / kWhBas carbone
Gaz490 gCO2eq / kWhCarboné / énergie fossile
Fioul650 gCO2eq / kWhCarboné / énergie fossile
Charbon820 gCO2eq / kWhCarboné / énergie fossile

Énergie hydraulique comparé aux autres sources d'électricité bas carbone

Principale source d'électricité de Énergie hydraulique

{{ rd.regionname }} {{ rd.value }}%

What are the pros of hydroelectricity?

To reduce global warming, hydropower has several advantages. It is a renewable energy known and mastered for a long time. It emits very small amounts of greenhouse gases. It provides storage capacities to the grid that combine well with other renewables such as wind and solar. It also provides electricity at a competitive price.

Hydropower can help reduce global warming

Firstly, hydropower is a renewable energy source that can generate significant amounts of electricity, 54.6% in Brazil and 61.2% in Canada for example, with very little contribution to global warming.

Indeed, it is one of the low-carbon energy sources that emits the lowest amounts of greenhouse gases to produce electricity (24 gCO2eq / kWh), unlike natural gas (490 gCO2eq / kWh) and coal (820 gCO2eq / kWh).

Hydropower is cheaper than coal and on par with gas

Second, hydropower prices average $72 USD/MWh according to the IEA. To compare, onshore wind costs $50 USD/MWh, solar costs $56 USD/MWh, gas costs $71 USD/MWh, and coal costs $88 USD/MWh.

Although the upfront investment for hydroelectric power plants is substantial, it largely pays for itself over time because their lifespan is almost infinite. For example, the hydro turbines installed on Niagara Falls in 1895 are still in use today.

https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020

Used since the 6th millennium BC, hydraulic energy keeps improving

Hydraulic power was first used in the 6th millennium BC in ancient Egypt. Signs of the first-known dams were discovered on the Nile River, which helped to cope with flooding and crop irrigation.

This technology was also used in ancient Greece by the Minoan civilization from the second millennium BC and in China from the second century BC.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9760/pdf

http://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/energy/hydro-power/hydro-power-in-ancient-times.aspx

https://www.hydropower.org/iha/discover-history-of-hydropower

Benoît Fourneyron invented the first hydroelectric turbine in 1827. This technology produced electricity from waterpower and experienced rapid development in the 19th century in France and then in Germany. Installed on Niagara Falls in 1895, it is still used today.

Hydroelectricity then developed massively in industrialized countries throughout the 20th century. Thus, the electricity produced from hydroelectric power increased fourfold between 1970 and 2020, accounting for 16.8% of electricity worldwide. Hydropower is thus the first source of low-carbon electricity. It comes in ahead of nuclear power, which represents 10.1%, followed by wind power (6.2%) and solar power (3.3%).

Hydroelectricity is a renewable energy source

Hydropower is a low-carbon and renewable energy, as are wind, solar, and geothermal energy. Indeed, once the dam is installed, it needs nothing more than the natural force of water, unlike fossil fuels that require fuel to generate electricity.

Using hydropower as energy storage

Hydropower has a key feature to achieve net-zero; it can stock energy on demand. When intermittent renewable energies (wind and solar) produce a lot of electricity, the water can be pumped upstream into the dams. And when intermittent energies produce less, stored energy from hydro can be used to compensate and thus stabilize the electricity grid.

What are the cons of hydropower?

Upfront investment in hydroelectric facilities is high.

Many hydropower facilities are major infrastructure projects requiring building dams, reservoirs, and power-generating turbines, resulting in a significant financial investment.

Therefore, the upfront construction costs are often significant. However, these facilities often last between 50 to 100 years (sometimes even longer), which make them a worthwhile investment. Niagara Falls has been in operation since 1895. This long lifetime results in a competitive average cost of between $68 USD and $72 USD/MWh. This price is more expensive than other renewables such as onshore wind ($50 USD/MWh) and solar ($56 USD/MWh), but it is equivalent to gas ($71 USD/MWh) and much cheaper than the most polluting energy to produce electricity: coal ($88 USD/MWh).

https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020

Hydropower facilities can have negative effects on the local environment

Hydropower, although a renewable energy source, can harm the local environment because of the implementation of hydroelectric facilities.

First, dams modify the natural flow of rivers, which can disrupt ecosystems. Secondly, in some cases, local populations may be displaced. Finally, in some cases, as in Egypt, historical monuments can be submerged by the dam.

These side effects of hydropower are generally lower with run-of-river facilities such as wave or tidal installations. However, most current hydropower systems are dams that block the flow of rivers. Based on existing case studies, new techniques are being developed to try to reduce the environmental impacts of hydroelectric dams.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaq1422

Hydroelectric facilities are dependent on local geography and weather factors

While hydropower is a reliable source of energy, it cannot be installed anywhere as the installation of dams depends on the local geography.

On the other hand, the operation of dams depends on meteorological trends and especially on rainfalls. Since most hydroelectric plants depend on river water, droughts hurt hydroelectric production since they result in lower water flows. From month to month and year to year, the amount of water available to hydroelectric systems can therefore vary, affecting hydroelectricity production.

Major dam accidents can have catastrophic consequences

According to OurWorldInData, hydropower together with solar energy is the safest energy source in the world at just 0.02 deaths per TWh. It is 1636 times safer than brown coal.

Nevertheless, out of all energy sources, hydroelectric dam accidents are the deadliest. In China, the Banqiao Dam failure in 1975 killed about 85,000 people and generated between 220,000 and 230,000 total deaths from famine and disease created by this tragedy.

Évolutions significatives des sources d'énergies bas carbone grâce à Énergie hydraulique

Région Années Évolution
Guyane française 2000 → 2001 0 → 90.6%
Sierra Leone 2006 → 2011 10.3 → 100%
Lituanie 2009 → 2011 79.8 → 14.6%
Congo-Brazzaville 1997 → 1999 92.4 → 32%
Mozambique 1996 → 1998 41.5 → 99.6%
Rwanda 1997 → 2006 95.2 → 17.5%
Uruguay 2003 → 2006 99.9 → 42.6%
Tanzanie 2003 → 2006 94.2 → 41%
Lesotho 1999 → 2005 38.5 → 97.2%
Soudan 2008 → 2013 29.6 → 81.9%
Suriname 2009 → 2015 76.8 → 24.9%
Belize 2005 → 2010 19.8 → 67.1%
Lettonie 1996 → 1998 29.3 → 68.2%
Kenya 1996 → 2000 87.6 → 44.8%
Albanie 2011 → 2016 55.9 → 100%
Cambodge 2011 → 2018 2.8 → 50.3%
Myanmar (Birmanie) 1999 → 2009 22.4 → 76.4%
Namibie 1991 → 1997 76.1 → 31.7%
Lettonie 2015 → 2017 37.8 → 72.5%
Zimbabwe 1998 → 2008 16.7 → 66.2%
Uruguay 2008 → 2014 55.3 → 94.8%
Burkina Faso 1993 → 1997 0 → 33.3%
Ghana 1996 → 2007 100 → 53.3%
Monténégro 2010 → 2017 69.5 → 31.1%
Croatie 1990 → 1996 25 → 61.2%
Mauritanie 2011 → 2019 12.5 → 52.4%
Guinée équatoriale 2011 → 2016 4.1 → 38.1%
Honduras 2014 → 2019 38.7 → 71.5%
Groenland 2008 → 2013 50.5 → 83.1%
Îles Féroé 2010 → 2015 30.1 → 61.4%
Équateur 2014 → 2019 47.6 → 78.9%
Kenya 2009 → 2015 55.2 → 87.4%
Ouganda 2011 → 2016 64.7 → 94.3%
Rwanda 2007 → 2015 17.9 → 50.9%
Angola 2015 → 2019 54.8 → 81.1%
Panama 2014 → 2019 55.2 → 82.1%
Portugal 1992 → 1996 19 → 44.6%
Géorgie 2006 → 2010 67.2 → 92.5%
Zimbabwe 2009 → 2016 64.4 → 35.9%
Arménie 2001 → 2009 51.4 → 79.7%
Nicaragua 2007 → 2014 28.4 → 53.9%
Turquie 2014 → 2019 20.5 → 43.5%
Macédoine du Nord 2008 → 2010 9.3 → 28%
Samoa 2010 → 2014 45.8 → 25.3%
Irak 2004 → 2005 1.5 → 19%
Guatemala 2003 → 2012 41 → 66.3%
Bosnie-Herzégovine 2010 → 2017 46.9 → 24.5%
Fidji 2012 → 2015 68.5 → 50.3%
Nouvelle-Zélande 1995 → 2001 83.9 → 63.6%
Guinée 1996 → 2002 40 → 60%
Kirghizistan 1991 → 1999 64 → 85.9%
Espagne 2005 → 2010 35.4 → 53.6%
Autriche 2000 → 2003 73.1 → 56.6%
Polynésie française 2001 → 2010 22.2 → 44.1%
Nouvelle-Zélande 2008 → 2016 64.3 → 84.2%
Costa Rica 1995 → 2000 82.4 → 99.1%
Vietnam 2010 → 2017 28.8 → 46.1%
Namibie 2012 → 2019 39.7 → 22.5%
Slovénie 2007 → 2014 59.4 → 76%
Pérou 2016 → 2020 50.4 → 64.7%
Salvador 2002 → 2010 47.2 → 64.2%
Luxembourg 2002 → 2010 2.4 → 18.5%
Kirghizistan 2013 → 2015 93.5 → 81.8%
Wind And Solar>12%, Nucléaire<6% 2008 → 2020 35.1 → 53.7%
Australie 2009 → 2020 7.5 → 24.9%
Suède 2001 → 2003 96.1 → 85%
Éthiopie 2008 → 2010 88.3 → 99.4%
Eswatini 2014 → 2016 30.3 → 19.4%
Venezuela 2008 → 2016 72.8 → 58.4%
République Populaire de Chine 2011 → 2020 18.8 → 33.4%
Maroc 2008 → 2019 5.1 → 20.7%
Ouzbékistan 2000 → 2005 7.3 → 18.7%
Costa Rica 2014 → 2020 88.1 → 99.8%
Norvège 2002 → 2004 99.7 → 90.1%
Maroc 1997 → 1999 15.2 → 5.6%
Serbie 2010 → 2011 33 → 23.9%
Chili 2013 → 2020 35.7 → 47.6%
Macédoine du Nord 1993 → 1999 9 → 20.2%
Brésil 2015 → 2020 72.3 → 83%
Venezuela 1990 → 1999 62.3 → 75.2%
Norvège 2008 → 2010 99.6 → 90.5%
Suède 1990 → 1996 97.7 → 87.4%
Malaisie 2010 → 2017 6.3 → 16.9%
Belize 2012 → 2019 54.6 → 64.1%

Blog

Dec 09, 2021
Where do our emissions numbers come from?

Nov 27, 2021
Confronting climate change requires ambition

Sep 08, 2021
Misleading claims about renewable power generation share in Denmark

May 10, 2021
What can we learn about decarbonization from past experiences?

Jan 21, 2021
Why are we not talking about hydropower?

Low-Carbon Power.org on Twitter

@LowCarbonPower