LowCarbonPower logo
Instagram Facebook X (Twitter)

Electricity in Mississippi in 2025/2026

Last 12 months Apr 2025 – Mar 2026
Low-Carbon Electricity
5,158 kWh/person -368
Total Electricity
26,158 kWh/person -461
Low-Carbon Electricity
20 % -1.0
Carbon Intensity
418 gCO2eq/kWh +4.5

In Mississippi, between April 2025 and March 2026, electricity consumption has been predominantly driven by fossil fuels, with over 80% of the electricity originating from this source. Specifically, gas accounts for about three-quarters of total consumption, while coal contributes just over 5%. On the other hand, low-carbon energy sources make up almost 20% of electricity use, with nuclear power forming a substantial part of this mix at more than 13%. This is followed closely by solar energy, which stands at 4% and provides a cleaner alternative to expand upon. Biofuels contribute close to 2% but are less impactful compared to other low-carbon options. This energy mix highlights the substantial reliance on fossil fuels, presenting a golden opportunity for growth in the clean energy sector.

Is Electricity Growing in Mississippi?

Looking at the progress, electricity consumption per person in Mississippi has experienced a slight decline. The figures from 2026 show an average consumption of over 26,000 kWh per person, which is a small decrease from the previous year, marking a drop of 461 kWh per person. This indicates that electricity use is not growing as it should to meet future demands. The low-carbon electricity sector also saw a decrease with new output at approximately 5,158 kWh per person, a drop from the previous record, suggesting the need for reinforced strategies to boost low-carbon electricity use significantly. This decline is worrying, as we need substantial growth in both total and clean electricity to meet future electrification and technological demands, such as AI.

Suggestions

To boost low-carbon electricity generation, Mississippi should focus on expanding its successful nuclear facilities, given their considerable contribution to the state's clean energy supply. Drawing inspiration from regions like France and Slovakia, where nuclear power accounts for about two-thirds of electricity, Mississippi can aim to significantly increase its nuclear capacity. Moreover, the state should consider enhancing its solar capabilities, learning from states like Nevada and California, where solar energy constitutes an impressive share of electricity production. Emulating these regions will support Mississippi in transitioning towards cleaner and sustainable electricity generation, lessening its dependency on fossil fuels and aligning with the growing need for green energy.

Overall Generation
Renewable & Nuclear

* 12M = Last 12 months (Apr 2025 – Mar 2026) — a rolling 12-month period, not a calendar year.

History

Throughout recent years, Mississippi's history of low-carbon electricity generation has seen varied changes. In 2024, nuclear electricity generation declined by 1.1 TWh, followed by a further drop of 1.3 TWh in 2026. Biofuels saw a minor reduction of 0.1 TWh in 2024 and have since stagnated. However, 2025 brought a short-lived resurgence with an increase of 0.8 TWh in nuclear output and a token uplift in wind generation by 0.2 TWh. The ongoing decline and stagnation in the nuclear sector, in particular, is concerning, given its crucial role in providing sustainable and clean electricity. Mississippi needs reinvigorated policies and strategic investments to harness its full potential in low-carbon energy, learning from both historical patterns and successful global counterparts.

* 12M = Last 12 months (Apr 2025 – Mar 2026) — a rolling 12-month period, not a calendar year.

Electricity Imports and Exports

Balance of Trade

* 12M = Last 12 months (Apr 2025 – Mar 2026) — a rolling 12-month period, not a calendar year.

Instagram Facebook X (Twitter)